Trait | | # in code | | Approximate bra cup size |
"Flat Chest" | | 0 | | - |
"Petite Breasts" | | 1 | | A |
"Small Boobs" | | 2 | | B |
No trait | | 3 | | C |
"Busty Boobs" | | 4 | | D |
"Big Boobs" | | 5 | | E |
"Giant Juggs" | | 6 | | F |
"Massive Melons" | | 7 | | G |
"Abnormally Large Boobs" | | 8 | | H |
"Titanic Tits" | | 9 | | I |
OK, so I'm confused here... In the Editor, when I look at these traits, it doesn't make this very obvious. Each trait is described in a particular way that is not clear at all as to this kind of ordering. For instance, the description for "Titanic Tits" says "Her breasts, if they can even be called that, have transcended the scientific laws of space. You could hug them like you could hug an entire person. How the girl wielding them even walks is a mystery." OK, those are almost like body sized, so they are quite huge... got it... but they are supposed to be 2 levels larger than "Abnormally Large Boobs". That description for that says "My god these things are like miniture moons..." To me, that sounds larger than body-sized... Moons are way too big. And to make it more confusing... "Massive Melons" description says "By the legendaries... her tits are like miniature moons. Hands and faces get lost inside them...forever." Talking about miniature moons again...
The bra cup size part of the list doesn't really match the descriptions. For instance, Titanic Tits are described as being so big that they defy scientific laws and that you could hug them like a whole person. In the chart given previously, those are said to be like I cup tits. I cup tits are much smaller in real life than that description. In real life, J cup tits (larger than I cups) are pretty much the size of a person's head... which is still way smaller than hugging a person's body size, and there are a TON of anime characters with breasts at least the size of I cups. I don't think you should assign an actual cup size to each because in general anime breast sizes are larger than real life and real life sizes aren't adequate, especially at the larger range of breast sizes... just make the descriptions sound relatively more extreme than the previous size.
OK... um.. I'm not going to sit here and just complain. I can offer assistance and a solution - better descriptions (which I came up with just now) that make it a little clearer how big each category is relative to other categories, enjoy:
Flat Chest - "This girl has no breasts - her chest is practically as flat as a board."
Petite Breasts - "She's got tiny titties - her little lady lumps are barely noticeable."
Small Boobage - "Her boobs are a little smaller than average."
Busty Boobs - "She's packing a pair of larger than average swollen full funbags."
Big Boobies - "This woman has some nice big knockers sure to get attention." (does this really have a +looks effect to it? It said that in the description...)
Giant Juggs - "Huge - These heavy hanging hooters are much more than a handful."
Massive Melons - "Simply Massive - hands, faces, and impressive phallic appendages can disappear into these luscious love pillows."
Abnormally Large Bazongas - "Holy Cow! This insanely mammoth rack of udders would make even a dairy bovine quite proud to lug around."
Titanic Tits - "Nuclear Warheads! Her breasts, if they can even be called that, have transcended the laws of physics and anatomy in size and mass. How the living being wielding these weapons of mass destruction even walks is a mystery."