Any chance we could get an 'Underwear' category while you're making changes to items? Right now we're forced to set them as Armour to avoid conflicts with clothing, but this of course prevents them from using actual armour and underwear at the same time.
Underwear is clothing, so it could be classified as such. If you are considering them as wearing it under clothing, how then is it applying changes to how they look with it being effectively hidden? Perhaps if I did add an underwear category I should then have girls unequip regular clothes for some activities then; how else would the other person even see them to be affected by them, with them being hidden under regular clothing?
You're not "forced" to set them as armour, that's a hack which you choose to do. It is not done in the core included items file, so I assume it's affecting an items file you're working on.
If you want to have your girls walk around in just underwear, perfect, they can be made as regular "dress" type items like our core included items file by LordShame does it.
I'm not adamantly against an underwear category or anything like that, though. I'll add it if there's enough outcry for it. Feel free to create a topic discussing it; this one is mainly for reporting actual bugs and for update notes.
This might be related to the whole Libido thing, and it's probably not a bug, but I've noticed that my girls that are really 'tough' (ex: they don't tire as easily and so don't take free time as often) are taking huge happiness hits. It might be a good idea to have the Matron take girls off work when they hit a certain threshold of happiness.
Fair enough thing for the Matron to handle, I guess. In the meantime, you might try
not working your girls 24 hours a day until they nearly collapse from exhaustion or despair.
It seems like MILF and Lolita are getting randomly applied to girls of certain ages if nothing is specified in the rgirlsx file. While this is intended and understandable for girls at the minimum age, and women in their 30s, Lolita is showing up on 20 year olds.
I'll check into the age ranges for these.
A bug I just noticed in my current game; the 'Have X monster girls' mission isn't actually checking for the Not Human trait. X girls of any sort will meet the conditions.
Actually, the error there is the 'monster' part of the text, there are two separate missions with that same text, one for normal girls and one for monster girls. The second one does actually check for monster girls correctly.
I'll check on this one as well.
Girls in this build are unequipping armour regardless of whether it is harmful to them or not. Considering all underwear type items are currently 'armour', this is kind of a problem.
See above for discussion on your special underwear armor.
Armor is indeed always unequipped for doing most jobs not related to combat (assuming the girl doesn't refuse). A change to have them only remove armor if it's "harmful" in any way was considered, but I haven't made it yet and it's not a high priority for me.