devolution

Author Topic: General Discussion  (Read 3821371 times)

0 Members and 54 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline DarkTl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4737
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4920 on: June 07, 2015, 09:05:50 AM »
I made a very simple application to show the classes tree I come up with, here.

Offline Xela

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
  • "It's like hunting cows"
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4921 on: June 07, 2015, 10:14:42 AM »
I made a very simple application to show the classes tree I come up with, here.

Manager should be separate from everything, There should also be SIW group I think where both stripper and prostitute should belong. This will make sense for the games logic.
Like what we're doing?

Offline DarkTl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4737
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4922 on: June 07, 2015, 10:38:00 AM »
You confuse classes and occupations. Stripper is closer to dancer than to prostitute in terms of skills. A good dancer has more chances to be a good stripper than a good prostitute. Of course stripper will have both service and SIW occupations.

What is so different in managers besides high managment skill? They are not warriors and not prostitutes, thus they are closer to service.

Offline lamoli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4923 on: June 07, 2015, 11:51:31 AM »
https://mon-partage.fr/f/WulaRdFx/


A few more poses.. i hope i got the expressions right this time.. and ill correct the others later


ill use ropes/bindings as clothing.. and as for the lose parts that goes up il add them just before the render
« Last Edit: June 07, 2015, 11:55:06 AM by lamoli »

Offline Xela

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
  • "It's like hunting cows"
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4924 on: June 07, 2015, 11:52:54 AM »
Mostly code logic, but that part is not ready yet, my way makes more sense to me I guess.

*Service and Managers are almost opposites of one another. They are not a very good fit in one category.
Like what we're doing?

Offline lamoli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4925 on: June 07, 2015, 12:57:08 PM »
Btw.. is anyone good with 2D image programs to erase girls from BG.. that would help me make those random girls packs faster..

Offline DarkTl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4737
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4926 on: June 07, 2015, 01:23:49 PM »
Erase girls from BG? You mean, delete backgrounds or what?
Cherry and me did it countless times for sprites.

Service and Managers are almost opposites of one another. They are not a very good fit in one category.
The problem with managers is that you need one per building at best, or something like that. Unlike other main classes, when you could make a brothel, a bar, or use SE and arena a lot.

So it's a bit strange to make them very unique and special, with their own special classes, when you hardy can use them compared to other classes.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2015, 01:44:35 PM by DarkTl »

Offline lamoli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4927 on: June 07, 2015, 02:41:01 PM »
Erase girls from BG? You mean, delete backgrounds or what?
Cherry and me did it countless times for sprites.


No the opposite.. recreate the BG on top of the girl.. even if its not in total.. it should be fine.. as i get a hard time covering the original character with the new one..


Like for cook24.. part of the original girl still shows up and need to be erased.. by creating the BG that was under.. looking at whats the BG look like in that area
« Last Edit: June 07, 2015, 02:46:08 PM by lamoli »

Offline lamoli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4928 on: June 07, 2015, 06:19:24 PM »
https://mon-partage.fr/f/1Wmmqwff/


More solo poses..


its hard to make some poses or facial expressions.. but i thing this should be ok

Offline DarkTl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4737
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4929 on: June 08, 2015, 04:48:33 AM »
No the opposite.. recreate the BG on top of the girl.. even if its not in total.. it should be fine.. as i get a hard time covering the original character with the new one..
No, this is too much. You need a real artist for that.
Instead would be better to use backgrounds without characters.

Offline DarkTl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4737
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4930 on: June 08, 2015, 05:23:55 AM »
There should be difference between warriors, SIW, service girls and others. Service girls are close enough to laborers, they engaged in manual labor. While managers, teachers, various artists are more intellectual professions.
I'm clueless about the name for the new group though.

Offline lamoli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4931 on: June 08, 2015, 07:00:10 AM »
Grr.. those impossible poses that free hand drawings lets you do annoy me a lot... ( doggy is impossible.. i even cheated with limits.. and iv spend 2h on it and its still bad lol ) i might have to use another reference image
« Last Edit: June 08, 2015, 07:02:56 AM by lamoli »

Offline DarkTl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4737
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4932 on: June 08, 2015, 07:05:08 AM »
I need to know more to avoid impossible pictures in the future  :)

Offline DarkTl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4737
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4933 on: June 08, 2015, 09:43:56 AM »
Oki, I have a more clear concept now. There should be fourth occupation and general class specialist. Teachers, managers, artists go there.
Please note that it shows classes tree and not occupations. Any class can have any occupations if needed, since occupations show what girl agrees and disagrees to do, and it may be very different even for similar classes.

Offline lamoli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
Re: General Discussion
« Reply #4934 on: June 08, 2015, 01:30:42 PM »
https://mon-partage.fr/f/BogQDR96/


With those ones im now at 52/58 poses from your action folder.. and i added 1 myself