devolution

Author Topic: @Peeps who have trouble building the program  (Read 2958 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anon21

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
@Peeps who have trouble building the program
« on: July 25, 2011, 05:56:38 PM »
[EDIT] This thread is now obsolete. If you have trouble compiling please post in the main thread.

I've had some PMs from a couple of people who are having problems building the program. Well, same here at first! Anyway, I've attached a few files and here's what worked for me in the end.

1. Get a clean copy of code in subversion repository.
 2. Export 'BrothelMaster' folder to an external folder (say 'WhoreMaster').
 3. [Optional] Copy over any new / modified files (like from my main thread)
 
 From the attachment to this post
 
 4. Copy 'Revision.h' into the BrothelMaster subfolder.
 5. Copy 'BrothelMaster.sln' into the 'WhoreMaster' folder (not the BrothelMaster subfolder)
6. Copy 'BrothelMaster.vcxproj' into the BrothelMaster subfolder.

You shouldn't need to do 5 and 6 in theory, but I when I tried again from step 1 I couldn't get the solution file to convert properly.

You only need to do step 4 if you did step 2. But I find it confusing to compile and mess around with code in the subversion directory all the time.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2011, 09:36:04 AM by Anon21 »

Offline Xela

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
  • "It's like hunting cows"
Re: @Peeps who have trouble building the program
« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2011, 06:42:27 PM »
Man... you should SERIOUSLY consider creating something like Anon's WM Modding thread, reserve top 5 posts updating them with new releases and keeping all discussions there. "User Mods" thread looks like an unorganized freaking mess...
« Last Edit: July 25, 2011, 06:50:54 PM by Xela »
Like what we're doing?

Offline Jaxter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: @Peeps who have trouble building the program
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2011, 08:56:15 AM »
""User Mods" thread looks like an unorganized freaking mess..." <- ... But in a good way.